| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80mm lens | 250mm telephoto lens | 80mm lens | ||
AS17-148-22704![]() |
AS17-148-22714![]() |
AS17-148-22719![]() |
AS17-148-22724![]() |
AS17-148-22727![]() |
"Throughout the outbound journey, they had a good view back toward Earth. Schmitt, in particular, provided lengthy and detailed weather reports, complete with predictions. His first report, given while Cernan and Evans were getting out of their suits, went on for a full half hour and, as the Earth turned beneath them, he could update his predictions for various parts of the world. Later in the mission, CapCom Gordo Fullerton told him, "You're a regular human weather satellite."
This all started with a Geek Trivia article on TechRepublic.com, titled "Worth a thousand worlds", which claimed that "most people are looking at the Blue Marble photo upside down," since the photo was taken with Antarctica at the top of the frame.
I immediately jumped in with the obvious comment:
"Given a weightless astronaut, floating around in the cramped cabin, peering through a tiny window (at a 45 slope), through the view screen (perpendicular to the lens) on a Hasselblad, I don't see how anyone can claim to know what's up, down, or sideways."
After doing a little research, I added more explanation:
"If you look at the original transposition, docking, and extraction photos, you'll see that ALL of the pictures are "upside down" relative to the camera. So it's more likely to say that the CAMERA was upside down. The Apollo Hasselblads didn't have a viewfinder (except for an external ring sight used with the 500mm lens). So the photographer would have held the camera in whatever orientation was most convenient given the location in the cabin and the orientation of the window."
The famous "blue marble" photos were taken before, during and/or immediately after the burn, while Cernan complimented mission control on the boosters' performance. [Apollo 17 Digital Picture Library says "at about 5:06", which is definitely after the burn.] There were actually four "blue marble" photos. The "official" one according to NASA is AS17-148-22727; many sources use AS17-148-22726 which was taken a few seconds earlier.
The first Earth photo looks brighter and less colorful than the next three. These images were produced by the Lunar and Planetary Institute for the Apollo (Handheld/Still) Imagery Catalog. The Apollo film from the NASA Johnson Space Center was scanned using a video camera with a resolution of over 700 lines. Each frame was digitized as a 24 bit color image at 756 x 486 pixels, producing a file of approximately 1.1 megabytes in Targa format. The images then received some "color" processing because the aging of the film had altered the original colors captured when the film was exposed. For the images on color film, a generic color processing formula, arrived at by tweaking representative images by hand, was applied in an attempt to shift them back closer to their original colors.

The histograms show the luminosity of the 6 MB print resolution images (Eric
Hartwell, using Adobe
Photoshop Elements).
The first image, AS17-148-22725, is definitely lighter.
The Lunar and Planetary Institute says, "Because of all this processing, these catalog images should not be used for research purposes." However, it's unlikely that they would have applied a different color "tweak" to the first image only, to make it look different from the next three. It's much more likely that they applied the same correction to all four photos, and the difference was in the original photo.
It's reasonable to conclude that the last three photos were taken with a different exposure setting.
| 80mm lens | 250mm lens | 80mm lens | |
#104 AS17-148-22711![]() |
#105 AS17-148-22712![]() |
#121 AS17-148-22728![]() |
|
![]() |
|||
There are two references to the Hasseblad's frame counter in the transcript. The first is 105 for the start of the 250mm pictures of the S-IVB. The second is 123 when the astronauts started cleaning up after the S-IVB's evasive burn.
(around 05:00 GET)
SC
[Cernan]
Let's just get a picture or 2 here yet, and then we'll give you a GO.
CAPCOM And Gene, it'll be about 7 minutes
until the evasive burn, 5 plus 03.
SC [Cernan]
Okay, you have a GO. And
for your reference, it's frame 105, I started a few 250 millimeter pictures
of the S-IVB.
(around 5:07 GET)
SC [Evans?] Houston,
Magazine, November, November is on about 123 right now.
CAPCOM Okay, Ron, magazine November November is on 123.
The actual frame count could be off by one either way in either reading, since the camera's film magazine had a very small analog frame counter. I've arbitrarily assigned frame #106 to the first 250mm photo and #122 to the last Blue Marble photo. Since the camera was motorized, it would have automatically advanced to the next frame after the last picture was taken.
From the Apollo 17 Technical Debrief:
EVANS Photography - Jack, I guess you've taken most of the
pictures on the translunar coast.
SCHMITT Most of the photography came to GET within a
few minutes. It was almost a continuous effort at the beginning of the day and
maybe in the middle and at the end with some irregularities - getting a
continuous record of a very nice view of the Earth and the weather patterns. We
had about three-quarters to two-thirds Earth through most of the translunar
coast period. And that should be in the photographic logs on the ground. ...
EVANS Orbital science photos - We really didn't have any on
translunar coast.
SCHMITT Nothing was called out. We used about a half a
mag on the Earth, maybe more.
EVANS More than that. We used a full mag before we got to the Moon.
|
"I'll
tell you, if there ever was a fragile appearing |
|
|